Strategies for the Classroom

Anti-Racism Series: Topic Intro | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3


Anti-Racism Series
Part 2: 
Strategies for the Classroom

Overview

This part of the series focuses on developing student-centered learning experiences and content, such as curriculum. It highlights anti-racist strategies to implement both in what you want students to learn (the content) and how you want them to learn it (the process). Antiracist pedagogy includes actively applying techniques to multiple dimensions of instructional practice – teaching practices, course curriculum, and class climate.

A Community of Inquiry framework (where meaningful learning occurs through interdependent interactions between instructors, content, and students) can be helpful when designing anti-racist learning activities and instruction. The process of learning, whether face-to-face or online, can be sustained through an integrated system of presences: A teaching presence considers the student – instructor interactions; a cognitive presence focuses on student – content and resource connections; and a social presence attends to student – student interactions (Garrison & Arbaugh, 2007). This part organizes many more examples by each type of presence through an anti-racist lens.

Anti-racist Teaching Presence

An anti-racist teaching presence optimizes student – instructor interactions. Establish the instructor as engaged facilitator by: providing instructor or TA feedback on assignments, learning journals, or other reflective activities; administering surveys or questionnaires and using the results to inform future instruction; participating in discussion forums or chats; sending announcements to summarize the previous week or describe the next week; providing online office hours for teams and individuals; mentoring individual learners; or developing classroom community through “working agreements” that determine how that community will work together.

Instructors can model anti-racist practices and a commitment to dismantling existing patterns of privilege and white supremacy in their interactions with students in many ways (see part 1 for more):

  • Ensure that you ask students to speak only for themselves, not on behalf of an entire group.
  • Design learning activities that are more often cooperative, as opposed to competitive.
  • Intentionally develop and structure group projects in which all students have an opportunity to participate and contribute. Assign project roles for students to assume, for example.
  • Structure class interactions by providing goals, procedures, and processes to ensure they don’t reinforce existing patterns of privilege.

Facilitating Inclusive Discussions

When facilitating discussions with students, instructors can increase inclusivity of voices in many ways:

ActionExample Language to Use
Entering a discussion“I invite you to share your ideas.” or “What are you thinking about?”
Paraphrasing“Let me see if I heard you correctly. You said…”
Clarifying“Tell me more about…” or “Can you give me an example of that?”
Building on“Does anybody want to build on what was said?”
Challenging“I’d like to hear from someone who disagrees with that.”
Acknowledging others“That’s a great point. I hadn’t initially thought about that. Thanks for raising that.’ Or “That’s a good question, which I hadn’t considered. I’m not sure of the answer right now. I’ll have to think more about it.”

Anti-racist Cognitive Presence

Curriculum Design

Next, build an anti-racist cognitive presence through student – content and resource connections. From relevant and strategic content to examples and visuals to web quests, design a course devoted to an exploration of diverse ideas. Strive to develop curriculum that models and reflects the diversity of our world.

Working to ensure that all students might see themselves reflected in course content signals that everyone’s identity and group membership are valued and emphasizes the importance of considering multiple points of view on a topic. Diverse points of view can be incorporated through the examples used to explain course concepts, through diverse cultural references, and through diverse scholarly perspectives, among other examples.

Your anti-racist curriculum
  • Acknowledges, respects, and makes multiple identities visible and represented in course materials.
  • Emphasizes the racial-ethnic diversity and backgrounds of experts who have contributed to your discipline.
  • Includes diverse readings, videos, and visuals that acknowledge the contributions and experiences of BIPOC scholars through content—PowerPoint slides are a great place to include diverse examples.
  • Is transparent-- clearly communicates expectations, learning objectives, assignments (see Tools for Revising/Creating your Own Transparent Assignments), and evaluation criteria (e.g., use of rubrics).
  • Presents course material using a myriad of modalities (e.g., video, text, audio) to ensure greater student access.
  • Seeks to understand the experiences and cultures of BIPOC students in order to plan learning activities that connect to prior knowledge.
  • Acknowledges that decisions and interpretations are affected by who we are.
  • Present counterstereotypes that change perceptions of who scholars/scientists are in your field (see Scientists Spotlights: Implementation Tips and Strategies). A range of activates and modes can help build counterstereotypes such as writing assignments (Schinske et al., 2016) and listening to podcasts (Yonas, Sleeth & Cotner, 2020).

Anti-racist Social Presence

Classroom Climate

Finally, establish an anti-racist social presence by focusing on student – student interactions. You can foster these in-person or online through: student-generated community expectations; discussions, collaborative tools and tasks (e.g., Think-Pair-Share, Team Projects, Jigsaw Activities); peer instruction and editing of work; or synchronous / asynchronous Q & A or discussion fora (Garrison & Arbaugh, 2007; Garrison et al, 2000). These types of interactions and learning platforms consider discourse, climate, and tone of the class environment.

Anti-racist climates
  • Provide opportunities to examine personal assumptions of a students’ background, prior knowledge, and experience.
  • Demonstrate high expectations for all students with an authentic belief that all can succeed.
  • Learn and be able to pronounce all students’ names and encourage them to address each other by name.
  • Actively monitor for potential stereotype threat and broad generalizations.
  • Create an environment prioritizing sense of belonging (e.g., where multiple groups feel “connected”).
  • Cultivate connections between students, the discipline, and scholarly and professional communities.
  • Ensure that students have an awareness of and access to campus resources that support their unique identities.
  • Maintain a classroom free from microaggressions and address microaggressions when they occur.
  • Facilitate a space where all classroom exchanges are respectful (e.g., norm-setting, working agreement).
  • Are transparent about instructor and student roles in the classroom, discussions, and activities and communicate them explicitly and consistently throughout the quarter (e.g., during the first day of class, in the syllabus, etc.).
  • Acknowledge the unique identities, experiences, strengths, and needs of students, embracing student diversity as an asset and celebrating differences (e.g., a safe space where differences are not only respected, but also honored and valued).
  • Invite students to approach instructors with concerns or ideas for inclusivity.
  • Support the Principles of Community.
Student-to-Student Discussion Language

Increase inclusivity of student voices in their discussions with each other by first teaching them to:

ActionExample Language Students Can Use With Each Other
Enter a discussion“I’m wondering about…” or “Let me throw out an risky idea…”
Paraphrase“Let me see if I heard you correctly. You said…”
Clarify“Tell me more about…” or “Can you give me an example of that?”
Build on“I agree with that because…”
Challenge“Looking at it from a different perspective…” or “I’m not sure I agree with that because…” or “I can see you point, but…”
Acknowledge others“That’s a great point. I hadn’t initially thought about that. Thanks for raising that.’ Or “That’s a good question, which I hadn’t considered. I’m not sure of the answer right now. I’ll have to think more about it.”

  • Acknowledgements
  • Michelle Rossi (Graduate Research Assistant, Center for Educational Effectiveness; PhD Candidate, Sociology) and Kem Saichaie (PhD, Director, Center for Educational Effectiveness) developed this resource. Additional contributions were made by Monica C. Esqueda (PhD, Program Manager, Betty Irene Moore Fellowships for Nurse Leaders and Innovators); Vickie L. Gomez (EdD, Director, UC Davis Campus and Community Engagement); Colleen Bronner (PhD, Associate Professor of Teaching, UC Davis Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering); Julia Houk (PhD Student and Associate Instructor, UC Davis School of Education); and Rachel Stumpf (PhD, Education Specialist, Center for Educational Effectiveness).
  • Citation
  • Rossi, M., & Saichaie, K. (2021). Anti-racism series. Just-in-Time Teaching Resources. UC Davis, Center for Educational Effectiveness [CEE]. Retrieved from http://cee.ucdavis.edu/JITT 

    Anti-racism Series © 2021 by Michelle Rossi and Kem Saichaie is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0.
  • Additional Resources
  •  
    • For an Inclusive Pedagogy Framework from the Center for Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), visit this site.
    • For a developmental approach for reflecting and intentionally creating a new assessment future which proactively includes all students, read this paper from the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
    • The Scientist Spotlight Initiative: https://scientistspotlights.org/ has a number of activities and assignments that allow instructors to integrate diverse scientific scholars into curriculum.
  • References
  • Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105. 

    Garrison, D., & Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157–172. 

    Schinske, J., Perkins, H., Snyder, A., & Wyer, M. (2016). Scientist spotlight homework assignments shift students' stereotypes of scientists and enhance science identity in a diverse introductory science class. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), 1–18. 

    Yonas, A., Sleeth, M., & Cotner, S. (2020). In a “Scientist Spotlight” intervention, diverse student identities matter. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 21(1), 1–12.